-
Share Are there any provisions for a future Park & Ride facility?
This would really help people living in Delta, who don't have as many transit options to get onto transit.
Maybe it could be built on the off-ramp area east of the west side dog park? on Facebook
Share Are there any provisions for a future Park & Ride facility?
This would really help people living in Delta, who don't have as many transit options to get onto transit.
Maybe it could be built on the off-ramp area east of the west side dog park? on Linkedin
Email Are there any provisions for a future Park & Ride facility?
This would really help people living in Delta, who don't have as many transit options to get onto transit.
Maybe it could be built on the off-ramp area east of the west side dog park? link
Are there any provisions for a future Park & Ride facility?
This would really help people living in Delta, who don't have as many transit options to get onto transit.
Maybe it could be built on the off-ramp area east of the west side dog park?
Jun Youl Kim
asked
28 days ago
Thank you for your question. The emerging vision does not include a proposal for a park-and-ride. One of the principles that informs the vision is to focus growth and amenities close to transit. In lieu of parking, there are strategies in the vision for improving bus connections to Skytrain, which should help improve options for people getting to and from the transit hub, within New Westminster and across the region. The emerging vision does call for pick-up and drop-off areas near the station, to provide brief stopping opportunities for those who need to get to transit via private vehicle.
-
Share Any updates? Transportation plan? Density allowances(fsr)? Is the city prepared for the province’s June deadline? I own approximately 26000 ft of land next to the station, will I be able to apply for a building/development permit in July based on , at minimum, the province’s fsr guidelines? Will the city increase the fsr from the provincial maximum?
on Facebook
Share Any updates? Transportation plan? Density allowances(fsr)? Is the city prepared for the province’s June deadline? I own approximately 26000 ft of land next to the station, will I be able to apply for a building/development permit in July based on , at minimum, the province’s fsr guidelines? Will the city increase the fsr from the provincial maximum?
on Linkedin
Email Any updates? Transportation plan? Density allowances(fsr)? Is the city prepared for the province’s June deadline? I own approximately 26000 ft of land next to the station, will I be able to apply for a building/development permit in July based on , at minimum, the province’s fsr guidelines? Will the city increase the fsr from the provincial maximum?
link
Any updates? Transportation plan? Density allowances(fsr)? Is the city prepared for the province’s June deadline? I own approximately 26000 ft of land next to the station, will I be able to apply for a building/development permit in July based on , at minimum, the province’s fsr guidelines? Will the city increase the fsr from the provincial maximum?
Pow
asked
5 months ago
Thank you for your enquiry. On May 27, staff brought forward a presentation and report to Council on implementation of the new provincial housing legislation, including designating areas around SkyTrain for transit oriented development by the legislated deadline of June 30th. However, before applications can be processed within the 22nd Street station area, the visioning needs to be complete, as per Council’s Interim Development Review Framework. More information, including the staff reports, Interim Development Review Framework, as well as a Guide to Transit Oriented Development Areas in New Westminster, can be found at https://www.newwestcity.ca/new-provincial-housing-legislation/transit-oriented-development-areas.
Regarding visioning for 22nd Street, the project team continues to work on a draft, building off the preliminary concepts developed and shared at the beginning of March, and is working towards bringing a draft forward for community consultation in the fall, with the goal of having a vision for Council’s consideration of endorsement this coming winter.
-
Share The OCP allows for 103,871 residents in New West by 2041. The submissions allow for as many as 22 towers. Has any scope been placed yet on how many people the 22nd St. neighbourhood can and should hold? And I don't mean the number allowed by zoning. on Facebook
Share The OCP allows for 103,871 residents in New West by 2041. The submissions allow for as many as 22 towers. Has any scope been placed yet on how many people the 22nd St. neighbourhood can and should hold? And I don't mean the number allowed by zoning. on Linkedin
Email The OCP allows for 103,871 residents in New West by 2041. The submissions allow for as many as 22 towers. Has any scope been placed yet on how many people the 22nd St. neighbourhood can and should hold? And I don't mean the number allowed by zoning. link
The OCP allows for 103,871 residents in New West by 2041. The submissions allow for as many as 22 towers. Has any scope been placed yet on how many people the 22nd St. neighbourhood can and should hold? And I don't mean the number allowed by zoning.
UptownT
asked
9 months ago
Thanks for your question. As you note, the submissions in the ideas challenge explore different housing forms and densities, as well as respond to the inclusive climate action focus of the challenge. To allow for creative responses, restrictions on density and form were not part of the challenge parameters. The Official Community Plan projections anticipated a certain degree of growth in the area around 22nd Street SkyTrain station. However, we anticipate coming up with updated and revised projections through the visioning process, informed by ideas challenge submissions as well as community engagement. The land use and density allowances will also be informed by the new provincial legislation setting densities around SkyTrain stations (more information here).
-
Share Now with the NDP implementation of transit oriented zonings, how does this change the timeline for the steps that were to be taken? Will the city be ready for June 30th implementation as we would like to build a 6 plex on our property. on Facebook
Share Now with the NDP implementation of transit oriented zonings, how does this change the timeline for the steps that were to be taken? Will the city be ready for June 30th implementation as we would like to build a 6 plex on our property. on Linkedin
Email Now with the NDP implementation of transit oriented zonings, how does this change the timeline for the steps that were to be taken? Will the city be ready for June 30th implementation as we would like to build a 6 plex on our property. link
Now with the NDP implementation of transit oriented zonings, how does this change the timeline for the steps that were to be taken? Will the city be ready for June 30th implementation as we would like to build a 6 plex on our property.
Wakesurf
asked
11 months ago
A number of momentous announcements from the Province outlined new legislation to get more housing built faster. We still have work to do to better understand these announcements, timing, and what they mean for our community.
We will be making changes to our municipal regulations and approval process to align with the new provincial legislations. As the information is still preliminary and new, we don’t yet know what these changes and the exact timeline will look like. We will share more as we learn it, and as we proceed toward implementation. Until then, we will be operating with a business as usual approach. Anyone wanting to redevelop their property before these changes are adopted will still need to comply with the current regulations and processes.
-
Share As I recall, the plan was to allow high-rise buildings in this area. Would high-rise be allowed everywhere, or only in specific areas (eg, close to the SkyTrain station)? Are there any six-storey mid-rise buildings in the mix? Will anyone even build those anymore? If towering towers are the only way to provide enough housing, then so it goes. But I don't think towers make a neighbourhood. Fairly large multiple housing can do so. on Facebook
Share As I recall, the plan was to allow high-rise buildings in this area. Would high-rise be allowed everywhere, or only in specific areas (eg, close to the SkyTrain station)? Are there any six-storey mid-rise buildings in the mix? Will anyone even build those anymore? If towering towers are the only way to provide enough housing, then so it goes. But I don't think towers make a neighbourhood. Fairly large multiple housing can do so. on Linkedin
Email As I recall, the plan was to allow high-rise buildings in this area. Would high-rise be allowed everywhere, or only in specific areas (eg, close to the SkyTrain station)? Are there any six-storey mid-rise buildings in the mix? Will anyone even build those anymore? If towering towers are the only way to provide enough housing, then so it goes. But I don't think towers make a neighbourhood. Fairly large multiple housing can do so. link
As I recall, the plan was to allow high-rise buildings in this area. Would high-rise be allowed everywhere, or only in specific areas (eg, close to the SkyTrain station)? Are there any six-storey mid-rise buildings in the mix? Will anyone even build those anymore? If towering towers are the only way to provide enough housing, then so it goes. But I don't think towers make a neighbourhood. Fairly large multiple housing can do so.
Luna
asked
12 months ago
Part of what is being explored through visioning for this area is the question of housing form and density. The City is committed to accommodating housing needs, and this area provides an important opportunity to put housing near transit, but the specifics of heights and densities have not yet been determined. We are watching the provincial announcements on minimum densities near rapid transit, and digesting the implications of this as we listen to feedback from community through the ideas gathering phase of this project. As you allude to, we have heard from community that neighbourliness, social connectivity, and having a sense of place are important, and need to be considered no matter the housing form.
-
Share How the new provincial legislation for more density near transit hub will impact on this OCP? Especially on timeline? The new law states that those TOD areas must be designated by June 30, 2024. So despite the OCP endorsed by the city or not, highrises could be built by then? on Facebook
Share How the new provincial legislation for more density near transit hub will impact on this OCP? Especially on timeline? The new law states that those TOD areas must be designated by June 30, 2024. So despite the OCP endorsed by the city or not, highrises could be built by then? on Linkedin
Email How the new provincial legislation for more density near transit hub will impact on this OCP? Especially on timeline? The new law states that those TOD areas must be designated by June 30, 2024. So despite the OCP endorsed by the city or not, highrises could be built by then? link
How the new provincial legislation for more density near transit hub will impact on this OCP? Especially on timeline? The new law states that those TOD areas must be designated by June 30, 2024. So despite the OCP endorsed by the city or not, highrises could be built by then?
pzckwoop
asked
12 months ago
In an effort to address the housing crisis we are facing, the Province announced proposed legislation changes which, if passed, aim to get more housing built faster. These changes are significant, will bring a big shift in our efforts to address housing needs, and will have implications for planning the 22nd St station area in particular.
We still have work to do to better understand these announcements, and what they mean for the area around 22nd Street Station and the larger community. The vision, and any future amendments or updates to the OCP will address the proposed legislation changes. More information is expected from the Province in the coming months that will help us navigate next steps.
-
Share Vision is great! But traffic!! Bold visions around walkable communities and community assets are of course essential, add in more people in higher density is a traffic issue. NOT everyone that lives in high density areas close to transits uses transit. For the 20th street traffic corridor, already identified by the province as a "problem," its not the "locals" its people outside the community trying to get to work, or wherever they are going that cause 20th street gridlock from the bridge back into Burnaby. We need infrastructure in place to address the traffic, and a plan for higher density. These may well be two related, but very different issues. Maybe we could just close 20th street entirely at 10th street, no more traffic from 10th Ave or from Bby??? Now that's bold! on Facebook
Share Vision is great! But traffic!! Bold visions around walkable communities and community assets are of course essential, add in more people in higher density is a traffic issue. NOT everyone that lives in high density areas close to transits uses transit. For the 20th street traffic corridor, already identified by the province as a "problem," its not the "locals" its people outside the community trying to get to work, or wherever they are going that cause 20th street gridlock from the bridge back into Burnaby. We need infrastructure in place to address the traffic, and a plan for higher density. These may well be two related, but very different issues. Maybe we could just close 20th street entirely at 10th street, no more traffic from 10th Ave or from Bby??? Now that's bold! on Linkedin
Email Vision is great! But traffic!! Bold visions around walkable communities and community assets are of course essential, add in more people in higher density is a traffic issue. NOT everyone that lives in high density areas close to transits uses transit. For the 20th street traffic corridor, already identified by the province as a "problem," its not the "locals" its people outside the community trying to get to work, or wherever they are going that cause 20th street gridlock from the bridge back into Burnaby. We need infrastructure in place to address the traffic, and a plan for higher density. These may well be two related, but very different issues. Maybe we could just close 20th street entirely at 10th street, no more traffic from 10th Ave or from Bby??? Now that's bold! link
Vision is great! But traffic!! Bold visions around walkable communities and community assets are of course essential, add in more people in higher density is a traffic issue. NOT everyone that lives in high density areas close to transits uses transit. For the 20th street traffic corridor, already identified by the province as a "problem," its not the "locals" its people outside the community trying to get to work, or wherever they are going that cause 20th street gridlock from the bridge back into Burnaby. We need infrastructure in place to address the traffic, and a plan for higher density. These may well be two related, but very different issues. Maybe we could just close 20th street entirely at 10th street, no more traffic from 10th Ave or from Bby??? Now that's bold!
NWRREZ
asked
12 months ago
We recognize that traffic congestion, especially along Twentieth Street, is a key constraint for this area, and already a significant community concern. As you note, part of the challenge with traffic in this area stems from Queensborough Bridge which provides an important regional connection across the river. As part of the visioning process, we are exploring transportation options. Included in this work is: reaching out to Burnaby’s City staff to understand impacts from growth in Burnaby; collaborating with the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and leveraging the expertise of our City’s transportation staff and consultants. Additional mobility concepts and transportation analysis will be needed as part of the visioning process.
We also intend to explore how development could be undertaken in a car-light way given that it is adjacent to SkyTrain, a regional-serving bus loop, and bikeways. We hear your point that not everyone living near transit can take transit. The goal of transit-oriented development would be to support new residents in choosing more regularly to not travel by car.
-
Share It seems there has been one time only for a "Pop Up" meeting that would accomodate people that WORK. How about a weekend or another evening, so other "tax payer's" from the 22nd St Skytrain area can attend? on Facebook
Share It seems there has been one time only for a "Pop Up" meeting that would accomodate people that WORK. How about a weekend or another evening, so other "tax payer's" from the 22nd St Skytrain area can attend? on Linkedin
Email It seems there has been one time only for a "Pop Up" meeting that would accomodate people that WORK. How about a weekend or another evening, so other "tax payer's" from the 22nd St Skytrain area can attend? link
It seems there has been one time only for a "Pop Up" meeting that would accomodate people that WORK. How about a weekend or another evening, so other "tax payer's" from the 22nd St Skytrain area can attend?
Laura
asked
about 1 year ago
Thanks for your interest in engaging in this planning work. The pop-ups were designed to allow residents out doing their regular activities to connect with staff, including at rush hour at the SkyTrain station. However, as you note, they were mostly scheduled during daytime hours. Two major engagement sessions were held on Wednesday evenings from 6-8pm – one in-person and one online to ensure there were options for people who may also prefer to avoid large in-person gatherings. We anticipate hosting another in-person engagement activity in mid-November in Connaught Heights. Details of location, date and time will be posted on the Be Heard page when the venue is confirmed. Lastly, the community survey and online ideas boards are also open until this Sunday, so please feel free to engage through those avenues as well.
-
Share What makes this time different? Similar initiatives happened before, but no outcomes. People tired of waiting. Can we know if and why this time is different? on Facebook
Share What makes this time different? Similar initiatives happened before, but no outcomes. People tired of waiting. Can we know if and why this time is different? on Linkedin
Email What makes this time different? Similar initiatives happened before, but no outcomes. People tired of waiting. Can we know if and why this time is different? link
What makes this time different? Similar initiatives happened before, but no outcomes. People tired of waiting. Can we know if and why this time is different?
pzckwoop
asked
about 1 year ago
We appreciate that the planning process for this neighbourhood has had starts and stops, and many residents are keen to see a plan finalized. Though the pandemic and subsequent staff shortages delayed the process, it has now been relaunched. To further our efforts, the City has also engaged a consulting team who will be supporting the work.
Following the creation of a plan, the actual pace of change in the physical neighbourhood will largely depend on land owners, lot assembly, and the development community. Development proposals will need to fit with the community’s aspirations, be financially viable, and be in demand in the market. Of course, the planning process will take these feasibility considerations into account when crafting the vision.
-
Share Why doesn't the 22nd St. Station Master Plan include the neighbourhood adjacent to it in the West End since it will allow high rises on one side of 20th Street, how can they leave the other side of 20th St. and Bowler St. out of the plan? It will have a huge impact on that neighbourhood. The towers planned for 20th St. will block sunlight, and create huge shadows as well as have all of the new residents using Grimston Park which is located in the West End, not Connaught Heights. Put the high rises in the middle of the plan or move the area to include West of 20th St. on Facebook
Share Why doesn't the 22nd St. Station Master Plan include the neighbourhood adjacent to it in the West End since it will allow high rises on one side of 20th Street, how can they leave the other side of 20th St. and Bowler St. out of the plan? It will have a huge impact on that neighbourhood. The towers planned for 20th St. will block sunlight, and create huge shadows as well as have all of the new residents using Grimston Park which is located in the West End, not Connaught Heights. Put the high rises in the middle of the plan or move the area to include West of 20th St. on Linkedin
Email Why doesn't the 22nd St. Station Master Plan include the neighbourhood adjacent to it in the West End since it will allow high rises on one side of 20th Street, how can they leave the other side of 20th St. and Bowler St. out of the plan? It will have a huge impact on that neighbourhood. The towers planned for 20th St. will block sunlight, and create huge shadows as well as have all of the new residents using Grimston Park which is located in the West End, not Connaught Heights. Put the high rises in the middle of the plan or move the area to include West of 20th St. link
Why doesn't the 22nd St. Station Master Plan include the neighbourhood adjacent to it in the West End since it will allow high rises on one side of 20th Street, how can they leave the other side of 20th St. and Bowler St. out of the plan? It will have a huge impact on that neighbourhood. The towers planned for 20th St. will block sunlight, and create huge shadows as well as have all of the new residents using Grimston Park which is located in the West End, not Connaught Heights. Put the high rises in the middle of the plan or move the area to include West of 20th St.
New West Friend
asked
about 1 year ago
Thank you for your question and comments. The station area was defined as part of the development of the Official Community Plan (OCP) process, which wrapped up in 2017. There was significant community interest in having the station area boundary at Twentieth Street at that time. More recently, Council has directed staff to reconsider the boundaries of the station area, including being open to ideas beyond what is demarcated in the OCP as the station area. The maps being used for this current visioning process now show a 500m radius, to depict what could be considered to be a walkable distance from transit (recognizing the steep slopes also impact walkability). We appreciate this kind of input regarding what kinds of uses may be appropriate west of Twentieth Street, and what kind of consideration is needed with regards to transitioning from higher-density uses.